On KiteTugs©  copyright 1996, Dave Culp Speedsailing

Previous Chapter |Next Chapter | Table of Contents



Possible Fixed Costs of Operation for a 30,000 sq. ft. KiteTug©:

Maintenance, helium and repairs (this is 50% more than expected maintenance costs of other modern sail assist rigs, on a per sq. ft. basis)1

$100,000

Fuel for auxiliary power, maneuvering, and free flying. Average of 200 gals/day x 250 days @ sea. (This would be zero if solar powered.):

$50,000

Crew salaries (three crew at $50k, 35k and 35k):

$120,000

Total annual operating costs:

$270,000

We'll look at profitably two ways; gross profit model, with the KiteTug leased, and simple payback model, with the KiteTug purchased for all cash.

Gross Profit Approach

We assume that the KiteTug is 100% leased, on a seven year schedule.

We assume the interest to be 9%/year, with a salvage value of 30% after 7 years. This will result in annual lease payments of:

$487,000

Grand total cost of operation:

$757,000

Annual income stream:

$1,092,500

For a gross annual profit of:

$335,500

Simple Payback Approach

Gross operating costs:

$270,000

Gross income stream:

$1,092,500

Gross profit:

$822,500

Industry expectations for capital payback are on the order of three years1. $3.0 million, divided by $822,500 gives a payback of 3.65 years

Options for Increasing Profitability

Option 1: The prototype is built in Asia,

and then production KiteTugs are built there as well. This presumes a capital cost for the prototype of $2.0 million, and $1.6 million for production Tugs.

This brings the gross annual profit on the prototype, under the gross profit approach to:

$497,500

And the gross annual profit for the production model to:

$563,500

Under the simple payback model, paybacks are:

Asian prototype: 2.43 years
Asian production model: 1.95 years

These figures are well within acceptable ranges, indeed they are far better than virtually any sailing retrofit system envisioned to date1. Even presuming wide variations in actual revenue streams, an average payback period under 2 years is perfectly acceptable to investors.

Option 2) Factor in income from salvage towing.

Under current standards of practice, deep-sea tugboats charge from $100-500/mile run, both out to a disabled ship, and back to harbor26. Thus, a 30,000 ton vessel, stranded 500 miles offshore, might pay $400,000 for a tow to harbor. Such a trip, under KiteTug, would take less than a week, both out and back (24 kts out, 8 kts back = 3.5 days). One single such salvage per year would dramatically change the financial outlook for a KiteTug:

Gross profit approach:

Domestic prototype gross profit:

$735,500

Asian prototype gross profit:

$897,500

Asian production gross profit:

$963,000

Simple payback approach:

Domestic prototype 2.45 years
Asian prototype 1.64 years
Asian production 1.31 years

This activity is obviously very profitable and KiteTug dispatch services will seek such commissions for their Tugs.

Option 3) Add 20% to paying days at sea

(presumes "pure" sailed days, which generate $8,550/day in fees) This may be done by reducing deadhead days (through finding closer "back tows"), reducing "at harbor" days, reducing "sail assist" days, towing larger ships, or any combination of all four. It only needs to add 20 average days/year to the mix.

Gross profit approach:

Domestic prototype gross profit:

$506,500

Asian-built prototype gross profit:

$668,500

Asian-built production Tug:

$734,000

Simple payback approach:

Domestic Prototype: 3.02 years
Asian prototype: 2.01 years
Asian production: 1.61 years

Fairly small increases in utility of the system can make dramatic differences in profitability.

Option 4) Fuel doubles in cost:

Gross profit approach:

Domestic Prototype profit:

$1,378,000

Asian Prototype profit:

$1,540,000

Asian production unit:

$1,615,500

Simple payback approach:

Domestic prototype: 1.61 years
Asian prototype: 1.07 years
Asian production: 0.86 years

Here we see that a doubling in fuel prices (a likely scenario within the foreseeable future) brings payback of a production KiteTug to less than one year. While materials costs for the Tug itself will likely also rise, its raw materials, though petroleum based, are a relatively small proportion of its all-up cost. Perhaps a 10-15% increase is foreseeable, which will still keep paybacks under one year.

Previous Chapter | Next Chapter | Table of Contents